Ghada Z El-Abedin Rajab, Mohamed S.A Elaziz, Shiamaa S Soliman, Ahmed I Basiony
Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society 2022 115(4):180-186
Aim To determine whether spectacle correction in axial anisometropes can cause significant aniseikonia. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on eight patients who had axial anisometropia with a spherical equivalent difference between both eyes equal or more than 4 D. Aniseikonia was measured using the New Aniseikonia Test ‘Awaya.’ Aniseikonia of 3% or more was considered clinically significant. Spearman correlation between the amount of aniseikonia and anisometropia was calculated. Results The mean±SD age of the patients was 13±4.64 years (range, 7–24 years). Anisometropia ranging from −14.5 to +5.25 DS with a mean±SD of −6.70±5.18. The overall mean±SD of aniseikonia was −1.45±0.52. Five patients had no aniseikonia, three patients had −1% aniseikonia, and three patients had −2% aniseikonia. Spearman correlation showed an insignificant positive correlation between the amount of anisometropia and aniseikonia (r=0.05, P=0.86). Conclusion Among our cases, spectacle correction in axial anisometropia did not lead to significant aniseikonia using the New Aniseikonia Test. Aniseikonia should be assessed in patients with anisometropia as 1% of aniseikonia per diopter of anisometropia does not apply in every case.
Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society 2022 115(4):180-186
Aim To determine whether spectacle correction in axial anisometropes can cause significant aniseikonia. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on eight patients who had axial anisometropia with a spherical equivalent difference between both eyes equal or more than 4 D. Aniseikonia was measured using the New Aniseikonia Test ‘Awaya.’ Aniseikonia of 3% or more was considered clinically significant. Spearman correlation between the amount of aniseikonia and anisometropia was calculated. Results The mean±SD age of the patients was 13±4.64 years (range, 7–24 years). Anisometropia ranging from −14.5 to +5.25 DS with a mean±SD of −6.70±5.18. The overall mean±SD of aniseikonia was −1.45±0.52. Five patients had no aniseikonia, three patients had −1% aniseikonia, and three patients had −2% aniseikonia. Spearman correlation showed an insignificant positive correlation between the amount of anisometropia and aniseikonia (r=0.05, P=0.86). Conclusion Among our cases, spectacle correction in axial anisometropia did not lead to significant aniseikonia using the New Aniseikonia Test. Aniseikonia should be assessed in patients with anisometropia as 1% of aniseikonia per diopter of anisometropia does not apply in every case.